In this section we turn to the arena of politics and policy, including the multiple actors and powers operating at and between different levels of the state hierarchy. It is an arena of formal and informal engagements and institutions where law, order, rights, investment, and accountability are navigated and argued over between different interests, between the two countries, and between the different levels of the administration. The pastoralists of Karamoja and Turkana do not have easy access to this space, yet community researchers argue that the problem of insecurity plays out here.
Part 2: Karamoja–Turkana - Realities of policy making and implementation
Part 2: Karamoja–Turkana - Interlocking insecurities
"Until the government understands why people need to have guns, they will continue focusing on conflict, which is the wrong side to solve this insecurity. Even after the disarmament, theft did not stop. Arrows and eventually the gun re-emerged. Let us focus more on the criminal." - Karamoja official
Part 2: Karamoja–Turkana - Research method
Community action research works because those who are affected by an issue are at the centre of decisions about how it is researched (Bryden Miller et al., 2003). When done well, it generates trustworthy, useful and relevant findings which often are contribute to improving relationships in a society, political system or organisation (Bradbury and Reason, 2001). The rationale is that the questions and findings generate workable solutions because those who are embroiled in an issue take a step back and apply informed logic to its analysis (Greenwood and Levin, 2007).
Part 2: Karamoja–Turkana - ‘Peace is not the absence of crime, but how crime is dealt with’
Communities of Karamoja in north-eastern Uganda and Turkana in north-western Kenya live with continuous insecurity, including large-scale and frequent cattle raiding, armed robbery, rape, and human rights abuses. Efforts by communities, governments, and civil society organisations over decades have repeatedly failed to bring protection and justice to the people of these borderlands.
Part 1: Priorities for peace and security
This section summarises priority areas to improve peace and security for pastoralists in borderlands, working in partnership with other communities and with local and international partners. XCEPT evidence shows how lack of meaningful agency in politics and governance is an overarching root cause of insecurity for pastoralists, and that increasing their political agency is key to better security.
Part 1: Key findings and priorities for peace and security
The 2020 African Union Strategy for Better Integrated Border Governance summarises peace and security challenges relating to African borders as follows:
In Africa, state borders are often not identical to peoples’ borders and hence have been known to foster three kinds of tensions: between neighbouring states, between states and their people and between states and violent actors, including international criminal cartels and terrorist groups.
Gender-sensitive conflict analysis training supports efforts to transform gender norms in the Central African Republic
In July 2024, Conciliation Resources conducted a workshop on the gender-sensitive conflict analysis methodology in Bangui with partners of our new project, ‘Breaking gender stereotypes to succeed together’.
Malte Peters
Malte joined Conciliation Resources EU/mediatEUr in June 2024 as Programme Officer. Prior to this, he was a Programme Coordinator for Carnegie Europe, focusing mostly on EU-funded projects in the areas of EU Foreign and Defence Policy, New and Emerging Technologies, as well as civil society engagement. Malte holds an MA in Global Peace, Security and Strategic Studies from Vesalius College (Vrije Universiteit Brussels) in Belgium. He speaks German, English, Spanish, French, and Dutch.